Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Questionable practice..?

November 05, 2013 01:22PM
Someone using a net receiver (and failing to state so in his report) would, indeed, be a "cheater". Absolutely! That's more in line with these SDR catches made while the listener is elsewhere or doing something else. In both cases the listener did NOT hear the station on his own equipment by his own hand.

As I mentioned elsewhere, I have nothing against SDRs - hell, I have one. But to claim the you heard something that the SDR recorded while you made a beer run is just plain false.

To me there's a "right" way and a "wrong" way to do things. Claiming to have heard things that YOU did not actually hear is the "wrong" way. It is cheating. And what satisfaction do you get out of that?

My opinion. YMMV.

-.-. --.-
Nobody wants a cheap hairpiece, but everybody wants a low-price toupe'.
Subject Author Views Posted

Questionable practice..?

jtart 749 November 02, 2013 10:12AM

Re: Questionable practice..?

Pat Murphy 463 November 02, 2013 10:23AM

Re: Questionable practice..?

jtart 479 November 02, 2013 12:31PM

Re: Questionable practice..?

Pat Murphy 434 November 02, 2013 02:36PM

Re: Questionable practice..?

BramStoker 475 November 02, 2013 01:32PM

Re: Questionable practice..?

jtart 468 November 02, 2013 02:28PM

Re: Questionable practice..?

Lee 527 November 05, 2013 08:53AM

Re: Questionable practice..?

jtart 435 November 05, 2013 01:22PM

Re: Questionable practice..?

Pat Murphy 439 November 05, 2013 01:36PM

Re: Questionable practice..?

Lee 506 November 06, 2013 01:09PM

Re: Questionable practice..?

ThaDood 450 November 05, 2013 03:27PM

Re: Questionable practice..?

Bill F 378 November 12, 2013 11:18PM

Re: Questionable practice..?

ff 458 November 17, 2013 01:10PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login