November 05, 2013 11:22AM
Someone using a net receiver (and failing to state so in his report) would, indeed, be a "cheater". Absolutely! That's more in line with these SDR catches made while the listener is elsewhere or doing something else. In both cases the listener did NOT hear the station on his own equipment by his own hand.

As I mentioned elsewhere, I have nothing against SDRs - hell, I have one. But to claim the you heard something that the SDR recorded while you made a beer run is just plain false.

To me there's a "right" way and a "wrong" way to do things. Claiming to have heard things that YOU did not actually hear is the "wrong" way. It is cheating. And what satisfaction do you get out of that?

My opinion. YMMV.

America needs a sense of humor...
Subject Author Views Posted

Questionable practice..?

jtart 1791 November 02, 2013 09:12AM

Re: Questionable practice..?

Pat Murphy 1513 November 02, 2013 09:23AM

Re: Questionable practice..?

jtart 1404 November 02, 2013 11:31AM

Re: Questionable practice..?

Pat Murphy 1390 November 02, 2013 01:36PM

Re: Questionable practice..?

BramStoker 1448 November 02, 2013 12:32PM

Re: Questionable practice..?

jtart 1479 November 02, 2013 01:28PM

Re: Questionable practice..?

Lee 1467 November 05, 2013 06:53AM

Re: Questionable practice..?

jtart 1353 November 05, 2013 11:22AM

Re: Questionable practice..?

Pat Murphy 1361 November 05, 2013 11:36AM

Re: Questionable practice..?

Lee 1491 November 06, 2013 11:09AM

Re: Questionable practice..?

ThaDood 1367 November 05, 2013 01:27PM

Re: Questionable practice..?

Bill F 1317 November 12, 2013 09:18PM

Re: Questionable practice..?

ff 1409 November 17, 2013 11:10AM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login