Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Questionable practice..?

November 05, 2013 12:22PM
Someone using a net receiver (and failing to state so in his report) would, indeed, be a "cheater". Absolutely! That's more in line with these SDR catches made while the listener is elsewhere or doing something else. In both cases the listener did NOT hear the station on his own equipment by his own hand.

As I mentioned elsewhere, I have nothing against SDRs - hell, I have one. But to claim the you heard something that the SDR recorded while you made a beer run is just plain false.

To me there's a "right" way and a "wrong" way to do things. Claiming to have heard things that YOU did not actually hear is the "wrong" way. It is cheating. And what satisfaction do you get out of that?

My opinion. YMMV.

Life should be enjoyed, not endured.
Subject Author Views Posted

Questionable practice..?

jtart 816 November 02, 2013 09:12AM

Re: Questionable practice..?

Pat Murphy 523 November 02, 2013 09:23AM

Re: Questionable practice..?

jtart 517 November 02, 2013 11:31AM

Re: Questionable practice..?

Pat Murphy 477 November 02, 2013 01:36PM

Re: Questionable practice..?

BramStoker 546 November 02, 2013 12:32PM

Re: Questionable practice..?

jtart 563 November 02, 2013 01:28PM

Re: Questionable practice..?

Lee 567 November 05, 2013 07:53AM

Re: Questionable practice..?

jtart 471 November 05, 2013 12:22PM

Re: Questionable practice..?

Pat Murphy 475 November 05, 2013 12:36PM

Re: Questionable practice..?

Lee 578 November 06, 2013 12:09PM

Re: Questionable practice..?

ThaDood 483 November 05, 2013 02:27PM

Re: Questionable practice..?

Bill F 429 November 12, 2013 10:18PM

Re: Questionable practice..?

ff 514 November 17, 2013 12:10PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login