Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: AM Radio proposal - FCC relief?

October 01, 2014 03:55AM
Finally someone from the radio industry is putting their foot down about reception and audio quality issues!

From:
[www.engineeringradio.us]




Subject: Meeting with FCC Commissioner Ajit Pai and Mr. Peter Doyle,
Chief of the Audio Division of the FCC Media Bureau
at the offices of the FCC in Washington, DC on Tuesday, September 23, 2014.

To All AM Broadcasters in the USA:

Kintronic Labs is concerned about the declining position of the AM radio service in the United States, which we reflected in our Reply Comments to the FCC NPRM Docket No. 13-249 on the subject of “AM Revitalization,” issued on October 31, 2013. In the interest of preserving this great national resource for local public media, we have scheduled a meeting with FCC Commissioner Ajit Pai and Audio Media Chief, Mr. Peter Doyle, to address what we believe are the critical steps toward putting AM radio on a more competitive basis with FM as follows:

(1) FCC enforcement of regulations relative to the power distribution industry and the consumer electronics industry that are not currently being enforced, resulting in a constantly worsening electromagnetic environment for AM radio service.

(2) The need for parity between AM and FM receivers through the establishment of minimum technical standards for AM receivers that would become effective as soon as January 2016. We plan to demonstrate a comparison of full-bandwidth C-QuAM AM stereo reception with a local FM station and with a typical AM receiver in a popular consumer multi-band receiver. The effects of adjusting the AM bandwidth from 2.5 to 10 kHz in 2.5-kHz steps will also be demonstrated.

(3) The need for FCC authorization of AM synchronous boosters. Unlike FM translators, such on-channel boosters would serve to increase the AM stations’ audiences while concurrently maintaining the future viability of the band. The related technique of wide-area AM synchronization for coverage improvement will also be addressed.

Referring to Step #2, it is absolutely essential that very close to full parity be established for new AM radio receivers versus their FM radio counterparts. This includes all key AM receiver performance attributes, including:

Low internal noise floor, well below the average AM-band atmospheric noise level. This includes all internal synthesizer and DSP circuitry within the receiver (and in the immediate environment for integrated automotive applications).
High overall RF sensitivity, selectivity, and dynamic range, to provide adequate amplification of weak signals, even in the presence of significant adjacent- and/or alternate-channel signals, especially in strong-signal environments. This would incorporate typical advanced, multi-stage AGC action, with appropriate interaction between the RF and IF AGC control mechanisms to maximize overall receiver dynamic range, including adaptive front-end attenuation for signal-overload protection in very strong-signal areas. Useful typical specs include: sensitivity – 1 mV for 10-dB SNR; selectivity (adjacent-channel) – 25-50 dB (adaptive).
Highly effective noise (EMI) rejection, including staged RF and IF noise blanking, accompanied by appropriate audio blanking and/or expansion when required. Such features were developed and included in Motorola chip sets in the 1990’s in the AMAX program, and are easily integrated into modern, high-density AM/FM receiver chips.
Full 10-kHz audio bandwidth capability with low detector distortion. This would obviously incorporate dynamic, signal-controlled bandwidth control (including AMAX-style adaptive 10-kHz notch filtering) as dictated by noise and adjacent-channel interference.
Stereo capability. If the receiver has FM stereo capability, it must have corresponding C-QuAM decoding for AM.

Without fulfillment of the first three requirements (this also includes the associated AM antennas both for vehicles and for home use), basic AM reception will suffer significantly compared with FM. Without the last two, the output sound quality cannot be closely competitive with FM (i.e., 10-kHz full bandwidth on AM versus 15-kHz nominal for FM).

We therefore petition the FCC to mandate the following minimum allowable performance specifications for all AM receivers that will be manufactured and installed in new automobiles as of January 1, 2016:

Audio Bandwidth: 10 kHz typical, adaptive, with a minimum nominal bandwidth of 7.5 kHz
Signal-to-Noise Ratio: minimum 55 dB, preferably 60 dB
Sensitivity: -120 dBm for a signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of 10 dB
Selectivity: 25-50 dB (adaptive filtering, using co-, adjacent-, and alternate-channel detection)
Dynamic Range: 100 dB
Noise Figure: 1 – 3 dB
Image Rejection: -50 dB
Intermod: IP2 , IP3 intercepts +10 to +40 dBm
IF: low with image-rejecting down-conversion, or double-conversion
Stereo Separation: minimum 25 dB

Respectfully Submitted,
Tom F. King
President



[www.engineeringradio.us]

Now Kingtronics sells radio equipment, but even so I believe that radio stations have been putting too much faith in the NAB and FCC for guidance, not being their own self advocates and stating what they want to happen. I know that caring engineers who hover over their stations are rare these days, so there aren't many to speak up, which is part of the problem too.. Maybe equipment manufacturers will have to step up and become radio advocates, so that those they serve can continue.

I've always thought that the highest possible fidelity, within the limitations of the medium, was the goal. It's not like TV or the net, all we have is sound.

Boomer
Subject Author Views Posted

AM Radio proposal - FCC relief?

Pat Murphy 823 July 05, 2014 06:22AM

Re: AM Radio proposal - FCC relief?

BramStoker 382 July 05, 2014 04:55PM

Re: AM Radio proposal - FCC relief?

ThaDood 366 July 08, 2014 03:24PM

Re: AM Radio proposal - FCC relief?

jtart 365 July 08, 2014 07:46PM

Re: AM Radio proposal - FCC relief?

ff 389 July 09, 2014 12:02PM

Re: AM Radio proposal - FCC relief?

Radio Animal 349 July 12, 2014 12:53AM

Re: AM Radio proposal - FCC relief?

Pat Murphy 333 August 23, 2014 06:51PM

Re: AM Radio proposal - FCC relief?

Pat Murphy 342 August 24, 2014 09:25PM

Re: AM Radio proposal - FCC relief? No AM in EV's?

ThaDood 369 August 25, 2014 12:07AM

Re: AM Radio proposal - FCC relief?

Radio Animal 384 September 06, 2014 03:47AM

Re: AM Radio proposal - FCC relief?

Radio Animal 351 October 01, 2014 03:55AM

Re: AM Radio proposal - FCC relief?

Pat Murphy 331 October 01, 2014 05:27AM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login